Obama's Big Michigan Right-To-Work Lie: Lower Wages  The
 president says right-to-work laws mean "the right to work for less 
money." So how does he explain the fact that incomes are up in RTW 
states while forced unionism is a proven job killer?
According to 
Michigan's Mackinac Center, using data taken from the Bureau of Economic
 Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics, private-sector, 
inflation-adjusted employee compensation in right-to-work states 
increased by 12% between 2001 and 2011 compared with just 3% over the 
same period in forced-unionization states.
Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/121112-636665-right-to-work-means-better-wages.htm#ixzz2Eq7BcROJ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Crowder is in Michigan recording the protests that are taking place.  At some point, as Moe Lane 
noted earlier,
 the crowd started tearing down the AFP [Americans for Prosperity, a conservative group] tent that was there.  When 
Crowder attempted to intervene, he was assaulted by multiple protestors 
with one protestor even shouting that he would “kill a mother f__ker 
with a gun.”
See the incredible video below:   
[I love the way Charles 
Krauthammer describes this business: we have the choice of allowing more
 [union] workers to hire fewer people at much higher salaries and 
benefits, or we can instead "spread the wealth", "redistribute" the jobs
 at slightly lower wages to more people."  Now why wouldn't our 
President like that?  While we are at it, why can't we call the Bush tax
 cuts what it is - a subsidy.] http://www.redstate.com/2012/12/11/union-thugs-shout-ill-kill-a-mother-f-ker-with-a-gun-while-assaulting-opponents/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Hoffa, president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 
said Tuesday he expects Michigan unions and lawmakers to break out into 
"civil war" after the state legislature passed right-to-work bills that 
would weaken unions´ power. "This is just the first round of a battle 
that´s going to divide this state. We´re going to have a civil war," 
Hoffa said on CNN´s "Newsroom."
"What they're doing is basically betraying democracy," he told CNN's 
Brooke Baldwin. "If there's any question here, let's put it on the 
ballot and let the people of Michigan decide what's good for Michigan." 
[Didn't we just do this on one of the ballot initiatives in MI?   The
 proposal would have made collective bargaining a right for public and 
private workers, but was defeated.  It is THEY who are betraying 
democracy by forcing people to join a union and pay union dues in order 
to hold a job.] http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/11/hoffa-predicts-civil-war-in-michigan/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A new poll conducted by 
Politico/GWU/Battleground finds that 76 percent of Americans favor 
“Cutting government spending across the board.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposed
 by Jonathan Turley:  Last year, universities received a seemingly 
friendly "Dear Colleague" letter from the [Obama] Administration 
demanding that schools actually reduce due process protections in 
disciplinary hearings for accused students and faculty in sexual 
misconduct cases,.  If they did not, the letter warned, they could lose 
federal funding and face discrimination charges..  The helpful 
"colleague" was the assistant secretary for civil rights at the 
Department of Education, explaining that reduction of protections for 
students was essential for preserving education as "the great equalizer 
in America".  [Keep the false Duke Lacrosse Team rape charges in 
mind.  Reinforcing due process for students has been condemned by the 
Obama Administration.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An international education must go well beyond the provision of 
information and is involved in the development of attitudes and values 
which transcend barriers of race, class, religion, gender or politics.
—International Baccalaureate Organization Subject Guide (1996).
Should we spend taxpayer dollars on a public school curriculum 
commissioned by the United Nations, made in Europe, and at odds with the
 principles of the American founding? Through the International 
Baccalaureate program, that's already underway.
Across the country, public schools (primarily high schools, but also 
middle and elementary schools) are paying into the International 
Baccalaureate (IB) program. Now, there are 1,296 IB "World Schools" in 
the United States, of which 279 offer the Primary Years Programme, 445 
offer the Middle Years Programme, and 751 offer the Diploma Programme. 
But a growing chorus of parents and concerned citizens oppose IB because
 of its conflict with America's founding principles.
IB was founded in 1968 in Switzerland to provide internationally standardized curricula for the children of diplomats.
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Only 7% of Detroit Public-School 8th Graders Proficient in Reading.  [But lets keep giving those in the Dept. of Education more and more money for salaries so that they will do a better job?  I don't think so, and being protected by the unions and tenure is not helping out students either.]  http://cnsnews.com/news/article/only-7-detroit-public-school-8th-graders-proficient-reading
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One million Americans entered poverty in the last two months  [It is all about how "poverty" is now defined in America.  As those who have read my columns know, one of the strategies of college professors Cloward and Piven is to put more and more people on government assistance programs, making them more and more dependent on being taken care of.  This is a way to collapse capitalism and have citizens wanting the protection of the government.  Then Socialism will be accepted.]
Four
 more years! Four more years! And we thought last month´s delayed 
foodstamp data was bad. The just reported foodstamp number for September
 was a doozy, with 607,544 new Americans becoming eligible for 
foodstamps, as a record 47.7 million Americans are now living in poverty
 at least according to the USDA. The monthly increase was the highest 
since May 2011, and with August´s 421K new impoverished America, over 1 
million Americans made the EBT card their new best friend. It is unclear
 just which atmospheric phenomenon will get the blame for this 
unprecedented surge in poverty,
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senator slams USDA for not answering questions on policies contributing to record food stamp use.  Following news that
 participation in the food stamp program hit another record high in 
September, Alabama Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions took to the Senate 
floor Tuesday to lambast the Department of Agriculture for failing to 
respond to an oversight request regarding USDA policies that have likely
 contributed to the expansion of the program.
The
 Alabama senator has been pushing USDA for answers on their various 
means of food stamp promotion — notably to people who either do not want
 or who should not be on food stamps. While he said he has received some
 answers that were “very troubling,” his most recent request in
 October (with a mid-October deadline) for more answers and for USDA to 
eliminate some of their promotion materials has remained unanswered for 
nearly two months.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/11/gop-senator-slams-usda-for-not-answering-questions-on-policies-contributing-to-record-food-stamp-use/#ixzz2Eq2MErvB  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
 
White House “Holiday” Card  Spotlights Dog, Not Christmas.  The 2012 White House “Holiday” card spotlights the Obama’s family Portuguese water dog — instead of Christmas.
President
 Obama’s”holiday” cards have been the subject of controversy in the 
past.  His 2009 greeting card made no reference to Christmas, drawing 
the ire of Republican Congressman Henry Brown.
 “I
 believe that sending a Christmas card without referencing a holiday and
 its purpose limits the Christmas celebration in favor of a more 
‘politically correct’ holiday,” the South Carolina congressman told Fox 
News Radio in 2009.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
      
  
  
      
-
---
 
 
-
 
No comments:
Post a Comment