------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chairman Genachowski will announce his intention to reclassify broadband Internet as an old-fashioned telephone system as a pretext for pervasive regulatory control."
According to RedState.org: "If the FCC is allowed to put the Internet in the US under those powers, then the Obama administration will have total power to tax Internet users, regulate content on Internet servers, and even institute price controls on Internet services."
Newsbuster.org also addressed what is going on behind the scenes: "The groundwork for government information totalitarianism - favored by people like Hugo Chavez- loving FCC 'Diversity Czar' Mark Lloyd and Marxist 'media reform'-outfit Free Press founder Robert McChesney - is being laid in the Plan being crafted by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski."
 "Any serious effort to reform the media system would have to necessarily be part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system itself." "There is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles." "We need to do whatever we can to limit capitalist propaganda, regulate it, minimalize it and perhaps even eliminate it." “At the moment, the battle over network neutrality is not to completely eliminate the telephone and cable companies. We are not at that point yet. But the ultimate goal is to get rid of the media capitalists in the phone and cable companies and to divest them from control.” |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Washington Examiner has this to say regarding the claims of Rep. Darrell Issa of California that the Obama administration offered him a judgeship if he would halt his run for the senateseat of Arlen Specter: Issa, the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said his panel is obligated to investigate the claims because they involve three felonies, including offering a bribe and interfering with an election.
"If Congressman Sestak will not tell us, then to be honest the only choice we have is to deal with this from a standpoint of congressional integrity," Issa told The Washington Examiner. "Under our ethics rules, either Congressman Sestak is lying, which would be an ethical violation, or he is covering up three felonies by members of the administration, which of course would be an ethical violation."
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/congress/Sestak-may-face-ethics-probe-over-claims-of-White-House-job-offer-94534059.html#ixzz0oZw274mN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A federal judge has struck a blow for California's water-deprived Central Valley, ruling that draconian federal water cutbacks violate human rights because — surprise! — people also belong in the ecosystem.
District Judge Oliver Wanger declared to federal regulators that they must consider the impact of their "draconian" actions on human communities, something they've never done up until now.
He also ripped into the environmental regulators for their junk science "guesstimates," stating that their shut-off "lacked factual and scientific justification, while effectively ignoring the irreparable harm (their regulations) have inflicted on humans and the human environment," according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
It's a landmark ruling that makes a superb use of checks and balances on power, given that up until now, these bureaucrats have never been held accountable for their actions.http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/534728/201005201852/Water-Sanity-For-Central-California.aspx
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is the portion of "section 834b of the California Penal Code that deals with immigration law enforcement at the local level:"
Read more: http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2010/05/hey-san-fran-how-about-boycotting-california-first.php#ixzz0ofR1lg3v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President Obama on Saturday [while addressing the graduating class at West Point] pledged to shape a new "international order" as part of a national security strategy that emphasizes his belief in global institutions and America's role in promoting democratic values around the world.
The international order we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our times,'" he said in prepared remarks. "Countering violent extremism and insurgency; stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials; combating a changing climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves and care for their sick; preventing conflict and healing its wounds."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Do you remember Daniel Pearl? Here is what our President said about him while signing the freedom of the press law:] "And obviously the loss of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments that captured the world’s imagination because it reminded us of how valuable a free press is..."
And here is what Mark Steyn wrote about it: ... its clumsiness and insipidness is most revealing. First of all, note the passivity: "The loss of Daniel Pearl." He wasn't "lost." He was kidnapped and beheaded. He was murdered on a snuff video. He was specifically targeted, seized as a trophy, a high-value scalp. And the circumstances of his "loss" merit some vigor in the prose. Yet Obama can muster none.
But what did the "loss" of Daniel Pearl mean? Well, says the president, it was "one of those moments that captured the world's imagination." Really? Evidently it never captured Obama's imagination because, if it had, he could never have uttered anything so fatuous. He seems literally unable to imagine Pearl's fate, and so, cruising on autopilot, he reaches for the all-purpose bromides of therapeutic sedation: "one of those moments" – you know, like Princess Di's wedding, Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction, whatever – "that captured the world's imagination."
I daresay that if a Republican or conservative president had suggested that the "loss" of Dr. Martin Luther King had "captured the world's imagination," the AP and the Times would not have so deliberately avoided such a statement, and would instead have eagerly sought out others to criticize it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This past Sunday, in one of the most aggressive and offensive intimidation tactics to date, hundreds of members of the largest union – the SEIU – stormed the front yard of Bank of America deputy general counsel Greg Baer’s home. The angry mob had bullhorns, signs and even broke the law by trespassing to bully Baer’s teenage son, the only one home at the time, who locked himself in the bathroom out of fear. [The police were actually tasked with the job of escorting the large buses to the man's house! It brings to mind the buses of union folks who terrorized the Chairman of Goldman Sachs last summer. Vigilante justice seems alive and well.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/22/senators-obama-admin-keeps-congress-dark-intel/
The Obama administration has failed to keep congressional intelligence officials in the loop on the investigation into the botched Times Square bombing, as required by law, the top Democrat and Republican on the Senate intelligence committee charged in a letter this week.
"Having to fight over access to counterterrorism information is not productive and ultimately makes us less secure," wrote Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein and Vice Chairman Christopher S. "Kit" Bond in a letter to President Obama. [The Justice Dept. disagrees with this assessment.]
It's a landmark ruling that makes a superb use of checks and balances on power, given that up until now, these bureaucrats have never been held accountable for their actions.http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/534728/201005201852/Water-Sanity-For-Central-California.aspx
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is the portion of "section 834b of the California Penal Code that deals with immigration law enforcement at the local level:"
(a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws. (b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the following: (1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding documentation to indicate his or her legal status.[Now perhaps those in CA should halt their boycotts and condemnations of the Arizona law...]
Read more: http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2010/05/hey-san-fran-how-about-boycotting-california-first.php#ixzz0ofR1lg3v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President Obama on Saturday [while addressing the graduating class at West Point] pledged to shape a new "international order" as part of a national security strategy that emphasizes his belief in global institutions and America's role in promoting democratic values around the world.
The international order we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our times,'" he said in prepared remarks. "Countering violent extremism and insurgency; stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials; combating a changing climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves and care for their sick; preventing conflict and healing its wounds."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Do you remember Daniel Pearl? Here is what our President said about him while signing the freedom of the press law:] "And obviously the loss of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments that captured the world’s imagination because it reminded us of how valuable a free press is..."
And here is what Mark Steyn wrote about it: ... its clumsiness and insipidness is most revealing. First of all, note the passivity: "The loss of Daniel Pearl." He wasn't "lost." He was kidnapped and beheaded. He was murdered on a snuff video. He was specifically targeted, seized as a trophy, a high-value scalp. And the circumstances of his "loss" merit some vigor in the prose. Yet Obama can muster none.
But what did the "loss" of Daniel Pearl mean? Well, says the president, it was "one of those moments that captured the world's imagination." Really? Evidently it never captured Obama's imagination because, if it had, he could never have uttered anything so fatuous. He seems literally unable to imagine Pearl's fate, and so, cruising on autopilot, he reaches for the all-purpose bromides of therapeutic sedation: "one of those moments" – you know, like Princess Di's wedding, Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction, whatever – "that captured the world's imagination."
I daresay that if a Republican or conservative president had suggested that the "loss" of Dr. Martin Luther King had "captured the world's imagination," the AP and the Times would not have so deliberately avoided such a statement, and would instead have eagerly sought out others to criticize it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This past Sunday, in one of the most aggressive and offensive intimidation tactics to date, hundreds of members of the largest union – the SEIU – stormed the front yard of Bank of America deputy general counsel Greg Baer’s home. The angry mob had bullhorns, signs and even broke the law by trespassing to bully Baer’s teenage son, the only one home at the time, who locked himself in the bathroom out of fear. [The police were actually tasked with the job of escorting the large buses to the man's house! It brings to mind the buses of union folks who terrorized the Chairman of Goldman Sachs last summer. Vigilante justice seems alive and well.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/22/senators-obama-admin-keeps-congress-dark-intel/
The Obama administration has failed to keep congressional intelligence officials in the loop on the investigation into the botched Times Square bombing, as required by law, the top Democrat and Republican on the Senate intelligence committee charged in a letter this week.
"Having to fight over access to counterterrorism information is not productive and ultimately makes us less secure," wrote Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein and Vice Chairman Christopher S. "Kit" Bond in a letter to President Obama. [The Justice Dept. disagrees with this assessment.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republican Wins Special Congressional Vote in Hawaii , Obama's Home State, for first time in 20 years.
Nonie Darwish, author of Cruel and Usual Punishment - The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. ... stated: "Intentionally or unintentionally, in the name of tolerance, we are bringing up a generation of Americans who will tolerate Islamic Jihad, in the name of cultural relativism and compassion." She also stated: "Tolerating intolerance is not a sign of virtue, but gross negligence." http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/05/war_of_wordcraft.html
Posts
All I can say is WOW ! What an EVIL administration we have--lots of anti-Americans in it, and their "leader" is the worst of the lot...Thanks for another set of news stories that, obviously, are not exposed in the main stream media who provide cover for all the crap and corruption and Marxism being developed.
ReplyDelete