----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World Net Daily informs us: Motorists in Colorado are expressing outrage over a weekend stunt in Gilpin County, about an hour's drive west of Denver, where highway checkpoints were set up so a private organization could ask for samples of blood and saliva
Sheriff's officials were apologizing after they helped set up and run five separate checkpoints over the weekend.
They said workers for the Institute for Research and Evaluation were overly persistent in their demands of innocent travelers.
gt. Bob Enney said the deputies' assistance to the organization involved stopping motorists at the sites along Colorado Highway 119 for "surveys" on any drug or alcohol use. Surveyors also requested that motorists submit to breath, blood and saliva tests.
Enney said several hundred motorists were tested, and some later complained.
Sequeira said he repeatedly asked if the questioners were law enforcement officials and said he was not interested in participating in the study, but still was not given clearance to leave.
PIRE spokeswoman Michelle Blackston told WND the deputies "did not stop" any drivers. "It was a voluntary survey. … Nobody approached them. There were signs saying that a survey was taking place. Nobody waved them down."
"For the record the proper response to ANY such incursion into privacy is to ask the question, Am I under Arrest? If the answer is no ask if you are free to go. If you are told no demand to be arrested or you will leave and then leave," added Frank Vicek. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=43616
[I reprint this as a cautionary tale. Who on earth would have allowed saliva and blood to be given, especially since those doing it are hardly doing it to unknown people? They had access to the license plates. My guess would be that those who submitted to this entire invasion of privacy were people young enough to not understand what other countries have been known to do to their citizens, and are unable to envision the future such actions might engender. We need to stand up, speak out, and demand our rights in America, and we should be prepared.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CNS News writes: FLASHBACK: When Asked Where the Constitution Authorizes Congress to Order Americans To Buy Health Insurance, Pelosi Says: 'Are You Serious?'
CNSNews.com originally published this story in which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dismissed the question of whether Obamacare was constitutional on Oct. 22, 2009. Pelosi's press secretary later responded to written follow-up questions from CNSNews.com by emailing CNSNews.com a press release on the “Constitutionality of Health Insurance Reform,” that argues that Congress derives the authority to mandate that people purchase health insurance from its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/flashback-when-asked-where-constitution
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wall St. Journal writes: Big employers faced with incorporating the first round of health-care changes next month are grappling with how to comply with the long list of new rules.
Many companies are hiring consultants to help sort though the mountain of new mandates, which include extending dependent coverage to children up to age 26, and may eventually result in covering more employees. Some are also considering changes to their plans—including pushing costs to workers. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703727804576011791786531256.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Wall St. Journal writes: Big employers faced with incorporating the first round of health-care changes next month are grappling with how to comply with the long list of new rules.
Many companies are hiring consultants to help sort though the mountain of new mandates, which include extending dependent coverage to children up to age 26, and may eventually result in covering more employees. Some are also considering changes to their plans—including pushing costs to workers. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703727804576011791786531256.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Congress and its current Speaker of the House are really pathetic ! How could dirty Harry be serious about his latest ploy, given the message sent in the November mid-term elections!!??
ReplyDelete