Dennis Prager speaks: It takes longer to watch the UTube video, so most of his words follows. He defines the greatest threat to our country:
"We have not passed on what it means to be America to this generation."
[Following are quotes from his speech, some being slightly paraphrased:]
A society does not survive if it does not have a reason to survive.
The greatest generation did not teach my generation what Americanism is.
We believe in equality of birth, but not in equality of result.
There is a moral dimension to smaller government. Americans give far more charity than Europeans do. The bigger the gov't, the worse the citizen.
They in Europe are preoccupied with how much time off, where will they vacation, when will they retire. These are selfish questions, not altruistic.
The very idea that the US is about to confirm to the Supreme Court a woman who has banned the military from her college campus gives you an idea of how deep this problem is. That to the Democrats this is not disqualifying is a moment of darkness in American history.
This is not a Presidential election, and is the most important in modern American history. It is a referendum on what we want our country to be.
Democrats have different values than America was founded on. If we do not change both houses [in this election], we lose.
America will no longer be the world's last best hope of mankind....we are the force for good on Earth. It was not peace activists who liberated Auschwitz, it was our military.
Do we trust the United States to increase good on Earth, or the UN? The Left believes the UN is a greater force for good than the US.
The UN just elected Iran to their Commission on the Status on Women! This is a country that tortures women....
I hope this [speech] invigorates you for the greatest fight in our history!
[Get out and vote in your state's Primary as well! In Michigan the primary will be held on August 3.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reuters news agency was caught cropping photographs of the Gaza blockade-running raid by Turkish radical Islamists, removing knives from the hands of the extremists and blood from the scene. Previously, in its coverage of the Lebanon war of 2006, Reuters was forced to retract altered images by a local photographer, Adnan Hajj, who manipulated photos to exaggerate damage, turn Israeli flares into missiles, and otherwise influence the reader towards sympathy with Hezbollah. Reuters fired Hajj and removed his work from its archive.http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/reuters-same-dog-same-tricks
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When asked by Matt Lauer if he has spoken directly to BP CEO Tony Hayward, the president said no and quickly defended his decision.Obama explained, "My experience when you talk to a guy like a BP ceo, he's gonna say all the right things to me. I'm not interested in words. I'm interested in actions."
The next day Gibbs said that Obama hadn't called the President of BP because it is his Board of Directors who are in charge, not the President. The latest in this saga is that after about 50 days, Obama has "summoned" the President to a meeting with Obama, probably to follow thru on his pledge to "kick someone's a__. [It's the Chicago way, after all.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Once again proving that Obama wears an empty suit and is just not qualified to be our President, American Thinker writes:] From the first gushings  of the Deepwater Horizon
   oil rig disaster, we have seen our president continuing to celebrate the  presidential perks, gushing himself over the musical talents of Paul McCartney and the basketball talents of the  Duke championship team. Yet it took President Obama  twelve days to travel to Louisiana to view the hemorrhaging oil along  the gulf coast. While blaming the Bush administration for a drilling project that his  own Interior Department had approved, Mr. Obama still did not directly  engage the chief executive officer of BP through the first six weeks of  the crisis. When his Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar, fired Elizabeth Birnbaum
   from her position as head of the federal Minerals Management Service  (MMS), the president accidentally revealed his obliviousness while at a press conference. The  Obama-Salazar administration had appointed Birnbaum to her critical  post in July 2009 because the president was determined to reconstitute  America's energy program, replacing seasoned experts on oil-and-gas  exploration with climate-change advocates focused on expanding renewable  energy. As reported by the New York Times: 


Before she took the job at  [MMS], Ms. Birnbaum [...] had virtually no experience with the oil and  gas industry, but that was seen as a plus, according to a top Interior  Department official. She worked at the Interior Department in the last  year two years of the Clinton administration on natural resource issues,  leaving as an associate solicitor in 2001 to become a top lawyer and  advocate for American Rivers, a conservation organization. Ms. Birnbaum  had never supervised more than a few dozen people, and the problems at  the agency were daunting.    http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/problem_solvers_and_butt_kicke.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The vision outlined in  the 2010 National Security Strategy invites the grip of paralysis to  render American power unresponsive to the threats of the 21st century.   Sacrificing national sovereignty, committing to international wealth  redistribution, and institutionalizing blindness on the nature of Jihad  and Sharia Law, the 2010 NSS represents a gross misreading of "the world  as it is".
The aspirations set forth in the 52-page NSS released this  May intentionally shape US domestic and foreign policy around a global  integration agenda.  Defining the 9/11 attacks as a "transformative  event" that revealed the "dark side" of globalization to the American  people, the strategy aims to position the United States as the  intellectual leader of a new international order that "promotes a just  peace" and facilitates collective action to meet the challenges of our  times.  To strengthen the admittedly flawed architecture of  international institutions and their capacity to enforce international  norms and the rule of law, a global engagement initiative serves as the  central pillar of the Obama Administration's plan to secure America.  
 the global jihadist  movement, which has perpetrated over 15,000 attacks world-wide since  9/11, has been reduced to a second tier threat to America along with  cyber attacks, failing states, regional and international crime  networks, food insecurity, pandemic disease and ... climate change.  
The decision to elevate climate  change to the threat level of jihadist terrorism amounts to a mockery of  reason.  And second, while concerns  over climate change may excite a number of progressive politicians that  have dedicated their public service careers to punishing capitalists for  having the audacity to establish a profitable job-creating enterprise,  the Obama Administration's decision to push the Copenhagen agenda in the  National Security Strategy amounts to nothing less than fear  mongering.  
Liberty stands before the guillotine. It is up to the American people to refuse to kneel. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/paralyzing_american_power.html
One question, then,  remains for those among us who would guide our national security  aright.  Is the Obama Administration's 2010 NSS case for assuming a lead  role in the international order free of unnecessary political and  economic restraints?  
Liberty stands before the guillotine. It is up to the American people to refuse to kneel. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/paralyzing_american_power.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hot Air  opines: Some grim humor could be found earlier this week, in the  spectacle of  the President’s “deficit reduction commission” going over budget and running   out of money.  The entire premise of the commission is absurd.  The  deficit is not the problem.  It’s a symptom. The  disease is government spending.  No administration or Congress dominated  by Democrats has any chance of diagnosing this disease, let alone  treating it effectively.  There is some chance the Republicans will do  better, but only if we keep on top of them.  http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/12/on-the-table/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comments:
Post a Comment