Combined with the rising cost of Obamacare, which is already forcing many US businesses to shed jobs,
this will have a disastrous effect on the US economy. Small businesses
will be especially hard hit, with large numbers of small business owners
caught in the new tax bracket. Even the White House itself admits that
more than 600,000 small businesses will be slammed hard by the new tax
hike (hat tip: Keith Koffler). Other estimates, based on Treasury Department figures, suggest that up to 1.2 million businesses could be affected, threatening more than a million jobs. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100191962/britains-millionaire-exodus-is-a-wake-up-call-to-barack-obamas-high-tax-america/
[Please be advised: these are not my words, but those of the webmaster listed below.] Thank
you to all who followed up and contacted legislators last night and
this morning. Over 700 emails were sent in! Your communication helped us
defeat the Obama Health Insurance Exchanges in the Health Policy
Committee this morning. The count was 5-YES, 9-NO, and 2-PASS. Not sure
how each member voted but will update you later. Based on the content of
the Speaker's Press Release, it sounds like he is not going to revisit
the issue!
Here is the text of a Press Release the Speaker just sent out:
For
40 years the party’s principal sources of energy and money — liberal
activists, government-employees unions — have advocated expanding
government’s domestic reach by raising taxes and
contracting its foreign reach by cutting defense. Obama’s four years as
one of the most liberal senators and his four presidential years
indicate that he agrees. Like other occasionally numerate but prudently
reticent liberals, he surely understands that the entitlement state he
favors requires raising taxes on the cohort that has most of the
nation’s money — the middle class.
More on this debate: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ruth-marcus-teetering-over-the-fiscal-cliff/2012/11/27/c2ff84b2-38d0-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_story.html
The
president once again avoided the term “tax rate” in his latest round of
fiscal-cliff comments. He basically said, Let’s get this done before
Christmas in a fair and balanced way. But what is balance? Another key
point: Mr. Obama never mentioned spending cuts. Never. Not
once. Yet Mr. Boehner has argued that the Republican revenue concession
depends on some entitlement cuts as well as other spending reductions
that would make up the trillion dollars or so in the across-the-board
sequestration plan that appears to have been junked by both parties. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/334312/herbert-hoover-obama-larry-kudlow
In
remarks on the Senate floor today, Alabama senator Jeff Sessions
blasted President Barack Obama and congressional leadership for holding
"secret" fiscal cliff negotiations. The Alabama senator insisted Obama is not serious about cutting spending--or cutting government waste. “In
fact, the President is giving speeches calling for even more spending.
On Tuesday, he gave a speech in which he said he wants to use the tax
hikes to ‘invest in training, education, science, and research.’
Investment, of course, is just code for spending.” http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/senator-blasts-secret-fiscal-cliff-negotations_664187.html
This
nation is living on the residue of the economic growth begun in the
1950's and accelerated in the 1980's. That tidal wave of prosperity has
ebbed. The United States has entered into a death spiral of unrestrained
spending, excessive taxation, printing near worthless money, and
stagnant economic activity. Rather than be straightforward with the
populace, the governing class is content to paper over the problem by
the usual shell games of phony long-term spending cuts, more borrowing,
and prevarications about the efficacy of raising taxes on "the rich."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/the_governing_class_and_the_decline_of_america.html#ixzz2DhdOH95W
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/the_governing_class_and_the_decline_of_america.html#ixzz2DhdOH95W
More
than two months after an Islamist attack on the American consulate in
Benghazi that left four Americans dead, including US Ambassador to Libya
Chris Stevens, we still don’t know what really happened that night —
and, thanks to a secretive White House and an incurious Washington press
corps, we probably never will. Not officially, that is. (snip) But
unless this country has completely gone to the dogs, it’s inconceivable
to me that a majority can stomach the notion that four Americans were
murdered on sovereign American territory while the president of the
United States took note, then rolled over and went to bed before flying
to Las Vegas on a campaign swing, secure in the knowledge that the truth
would never come out because it didn’t fit his media protectors’
beloved “narrative” that GM was alive and Osama bin Laden was dead. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/334325/benghazi-blowback-michael-walsh#
The
president’s insistence that Rice is, in essence, “his girl” and,
therefore, untouchable, is uncharacteristically quaint and flies in the
face of every feminist in the country. So much so, in fact, that
left-leaning Washington analyst and columnist Kirsten Powers recently called Obama’s defense of Rice, “silly, sexist and paternalistic.” It seems Powers has given up the Kool-Aid, because she went on to pen:
“Imagine George Bush saying that people criticized John Bolton because
he was an ‘easy target.’ He wouldn’t.” Why did Rice and Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton ignore the State Department’s e-mail (leaked by Reuters) sent at 6:07 p.m. on September 11 crediting Anasar al-Sharia, a radical Islamist militia, with the consulate attack?
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/84348.html#ixzz2DesVX7BM
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/84348.html#ixzz2DesVX7BM
Rice has the highest net worth of executive branch members, with a fortune estimated between $24 to $44 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. A Free Beacon analysis
of Rice’s portfolio shows thousands of dollars invested in at least
three separate companies cited by lawmakers on Capitol Hill for doing
business in Iran’s oil and gas sector. “That Susan Rice invested in
companies doing business in Iran shows either the Obama administration’s
lack of seriousness regarding Iran or Rice’s own immorality,” said
Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon adviser on Iran and Iraq. “Either way,
her actions undercut her ability to demand our allies unity on Iran.” http://freebeacon.com/susan-rices-enrichment-program/
Here’s
a perplexing pair of statistics: Compared with native-born Americans,
immigrants are more likely to start a business — and they’re also more
likely to depend on welfare. (snip) Senator
Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.), crunched numbers from the Department of
Agriculture and found that the number of non-citizens on food stamps has
risen to 1.634 million, roughly quadrupling since 2001. Moreover, in
August, the Center for Immigration Studies found that 36 percent of
immigrant-headed households received at least one major welfare benefit.
Food assistance and Medicaid have become especially popular among
immigrants. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/334337/immigrant-welfare-new-colossus-jillian-kay-melchior
Simply,
under the terms of the order, the RNC cannot engage in ballot security
efforts to combat voter fraud. This is part of the larger pattern of
conservatives simply not understanding the way the left has manipulated the Machine. Read my piece at Front Page for more warnings about the state of play. http://frontpagemag.com/2011/j-christian-adams/the-left-owns-the-election-law-industry/
Our
culture now revolves around victims, and it long past time that the GOP
exploited the favorite technique of the left. It is time to call hard
working Americans an "endangered species."
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/11/work_is_for_suckers.html#ixzz2DhlYdk2M
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/11/work_is_for_suckers.html#ixzz2DhlYdk2M
(this is a sad example of how much control our government has over our welfare) The
Drakes Bay Oyster Company has been in a seven-year fight with the
federal government and environmental groups over whether it’s 40-year
lease would be renewed this week. The Lunny family, which owns the
oyster farm, was among a group of families that sold their ranch lands
to the National Parks Service in the 1970s to protect them from
developers, with the understanding they would get 40-year-leases renewed
in perpetuity. After buying and operating the oyster farm without
incident— they were even featured as outstanding environmental stewards
by the National Parks Service— the Lunnys learned in 2005 they were
accused of bringing environmental damage to an area the NPS and
environmentalists were anxious to designate as the nation’s first
federally recognized marine wilderness. http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/29/video-feds-shut-down-100-year-old-oyster-company-destroys-some-lives-and-dreams/
The
tax protection that 401(k)s have now can be wiped out by grasping
politicians who refuse to do what's right, which is to severely cut
spending.
The war on retirement, particularly 401(k)s, is quiet now. But that's because it's a cold war. A
website set up by the ASPPA advises account holders to tell lawmakers
to "keep their hands off your retirement savings" and explains that
"Congress needs to reduce the deficit, and part of deficit reduction
will most likely be 'tax reform' that increases tax revenue" — the
strong suggestion being that Washington is coming after Americans' 401(k)s.
Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/112812-634984-401k-on-the-table-for-fiscal-cliff.htm#ixzz2Dhzx4JVU
Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/112812-634984-401k-on-the-table-for-fiscal-cliff.htm#ixzz2Dhzx4JVU
He's
financially backed small business owners so they can get up and
running, and has funded students' college educations through scholarship
programs. And starting on January 1, he's leaving his stores to his
employees. Though
he could have turned a larger profit by selling to a chain, the
store-owner said it wouldn’t be right not to share his wealth with those
who had helped him the most.
'My
employees are largely responsible for any success I've had, and they
deserve to get some of the benefits of that,' he told the paper. 'You
can't always take. You also have to give back.' (hmmmm…..fiscal cliff??)
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2239883/Retiring-grocery-store-owner-70-gives-supermarkets-employees-travel-wife.html#ixzz2DemZEG45
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment