I love this depiction of our Capitol - the disfunctional place that it is, taken by my disfunctioning camera! 
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
The liberal Politico writes: Dems' 'Mediscare' A  Dubious Winner
Now,  PolitiFact has chosen the Democrats' claim as the 2011 Lie of the   Year.  The Democratic attack about "ending  Medicare" was a pervasive  line in 2011 that preyed on seniors' worries  about whether they could  afford health care (Drobnic Holan and Adair,  12/20).
 • Just four days after the party-line vote,  the  Democratic Congressional  Campaign Committee released a Web ad, saying  seniors will have to pay  $12,500 more for health care “because  Republicans voted to end  Medicare.”
• Rep. Steve Israel of New York, chairman of the DCCC,   appeared on cable news shows and declared that Republicans voted to   “terminate Medicare.”
• A Web video from the Agenda Project,  a liberal group, said the Ryan  plan would leave the country “without  Medicare” and showed a Ryan  look-alike pushing an old woman in a  wheelchair off a cliff.
• And just last month, House Minority  Leader Nancy Pelosi sent a  fundraising appeal that read, “House  Republicans’ vote to end Medicare  is a shameful act of betrayal.”
Read   more: 
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70705.html#ixzz1hlQgQgA0------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
AP reports: Already they [Occupy] have  interrupted Michele Bachmann and drawn a withering putdown from Newt  Gingrich as "all noise, no thought."
Now, to  the dismay of Iowa Republicans, Occupy activists in Des Moines are  vowing to expand their protests as GOP presidential hopefuls converge on  the state that speaks first in the race for the party's presidential  nomination. 
Gingrich dismissed  them as the "one-tenth of  one percent" and noted he'd been similarly heckled during an earlier  stop in Iowa City. "All noise, no thought, tried to drown out  conversation," he said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Election Law Center writes: The Wall Street Journal   had the must-read article on DOJ's refusal to permit South   Carolina to implement a photo ID law.  Below is an excerpt from   Assistant Attorney General Perez's letter to South Carolina objecting on   behalf of Attorney General Holder.
"Although the state has a  legitimate interest in preventing voter  fraud and safeguarding voter  confidence," it didn't provide "any  evidence or instance of either  in-person voter impersonation or any  other type of fraud that is not  already addressed by the state's  existing voter identification  requirement," said Thomas Perez,  assistant attorney for civil rights, in  a letter to state officials. 
In its letter, DOJ rejected  South Carolina's voter ID law, in large  part because the state failed  to provide "any evidence or instance of  either in-person voter  impersonation or any other type of fraud..."   Requiring a state to  provide evidence of extensive fraud sets an   elevated standard specifically rejected by the Supreme Court and in   direct contradiction to the Court's opinion endorsing photo   identification and previous precedent. 
Also in its letter to  South  Carolina, DOJ asserted that requiring a voter to obtain a photo ID   might burden voters to obtain the necessary documentation and prevent   them from voting.  The Supreme Court had previously disposed of that   argument by essentially stating that the burden to travel to an   elections office with proof of identity or to a drivers license   agency to obtain the appropriate identification is no more a burden that   traveling to a polling place to cast a ballot.  The Supreme Court  found  the law was not discriminatory.  DOJ failed to take into account  that  voter turnout had increased in voter ID states thus speculating  that  voter ID would decrease turnout had no evidentiary basis and  counter to  existing statistics since implementation of the law.   http://electionlawcenter.com/2011/12/24/contradicting-supreme-court-doj-rejected-sc-photo-id-law-due-to-lack-to-voter-impersonation-fraud.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USA Today writes: Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who has   helped  legislators in several states craft laws aimed at  illegal   immigrants, said legislators will continue expanding programs such as   E-Verify,  which businesses can use to check the immigration status of   job applicants.
Yet it's a new  provision in Alabama's law that  has become popular. Kobach, a  Republican, said Alabama was the first  state to invalidate all  contracts entered into with illegal immigrants. A  strict reading of the  law could mean any contract, including apartment  leases and basic work  agreements, can be ruled null and void.
Another aspect of Alabama's law forbids illegal   immigrants from conducting any "business transaction" with a government   agency. An Alabama federal  judge ruled  that the state must stop using   that provision to prohibit illegal immigrants from renewing permits  for  their mobile homes, but it's being applied elsewhere.
The combination of those provisions "has led to   nothing short of chaos in the state," said Karen Tumlin, managing   attorney for the National Immigration Law Center, which was part of a   lawsuit against Alabama's law. "They've been applied to a striking range   of activities, from getting tags on your cars to getting public   utilities to changing title on your cars."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sen. Ben Nelson,  D-Neb., will announce later on Tuesday that he will retire after two  terms in office, according to a senior Democratic operative familiar  with his plans. Nelson's decision is a serious blow to Democrats' hopes  of maintaining its slim Senate majority, turning what would have been a  competitive red-state Senate race into a very likely GOP pickup next  year.
News of Nelson's retirement is especially tough  for Democrats, given that outside groups poured over $1 million in ads  on his behalf to shore up his standing in the state. The ads were also  aired in hopes of convincing Nelson to run for a third term.
Republicans  have aggressively targeted Nelson this year, and outside GOP groups had  already begun pouring money into the state, hitting him over his vote  for President Obama's  health care law.
Follow  this story on nationaljournal.com as it develops » 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reuters writes: The White House  plans to ask Congress by the end of the week for an increase in the  government's debt ceiling to allow the United States to pay its bills on  time, according to a senior Treasury Department official on Tuesday.
The approval is expected to go  through without a challenge, given that Congress is in recess until  later in January and the request is in line with an agreement to keep  the U.S. government funded into 2013. Under the agreement struck in August during the  showdown over the government's debt limit, the cap is automatically  raised unless Congress votes to block the debt-ceiling extension. 
The deal called for raising the debt ceiling  by $2.1 trillion to serve the nation's borrowing needs into 2013 and  also included mandatory cuts to the federal budget deficit. Since then,  the extension has been increased twice by a total of $900 billion.
The debt limit currently stands at $15.194  trillion and would increase to $16.394 trillion with the reques
 http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/27/us-usa-treasury-debt-idUSTRE7BQ0KU20111227  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Thinker writes about crony capitalism: John Kerry specializes in using advance  information on upcoming bills to make investments, which Schweizer  correctly characterizes as a form of insider trading. During the  ObamaCare debate of 2009 Kerry invested $200,000 in the healthcare  company ResMed, the value of which shot up over 70%, a tidy little  windfall even to a man married into one of the richest families in the  United States. At the same time, ObamaCare cut Medicare reimbursements,  so Kerry dumped all his shares in United Health, a medical insurance  company deeply dependent on Medicare. Kerry, it seems, didn't have to  pass the bill to know what was in it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Thinkers opines: This century will be an American century,  much like the last one.  Despite what President Obama believes, we are  not one nation among many, we are the United States of America, the  greatest nation on earth, and the last best hope for humanity. 
The only thing standing between the United  States and continued exceptionalism is the dreary delirium of Barack  Obama, whose dismal socialist policies have been a spectacular disaster  for the nation.
Now they say, the Chinese that will bury us.   Falling behind China is a recurring theme in many of Barack Obama's  speeches.  We have to do as they do, or we risk losing out.  State  directed capitalism is the wave of the future, resistance is futile.   Americans must pay more taxes, and give the President more control...of  well...everything.
America, because of immigration and a birthrate near replacement level,  will not be aging the way Russia, Japan, Europe and China are.  Despite Barack  Obama's best effort, we have comparatively little racial, religious and  economic strife, a moderately free press, and the most economic freedom  and mobility the world has ever known. 
We have a dynamic economy and are still the  world's largest manufacturer.  America is blessed with an abundance of natural resources.  Due to  improvements in technology, we now have potential fossil fuel resources  to last us 200 years or more.  Since much of  it is on federal lands, some have said the royalties to the Treasury  have the potential to pay off the national debt.  To paraphrase Joe Biden, it is a big fracking deal.
Even if Mr. Obama wins reelection, he can  only delay the coming energy independence of America, he cannot prevent  it.  Citizens, not thrilled with him now, will be irate when their  electric bills triple and gasoline is $10 a gallon.  All that oil, coal  and natural gas will come out of the ground.  Obama, as a modern day King Canute trying to command  the tide, will be powerless to stop it.  
Four more years of this President will leave  the nation miserable and divided, with high unemployment, a moribund  economy and a bloated bureaucracy.  With another term, Barack Obama will  continue his transformation of America into a land of perpetual  trillion dollar deficits and a national debt measured in the tens of  trillions of dollars.  We will be weak militarily, morally and  economically.  Lesser nations, like those discussed here, would not  survive 8 years of hope and change, but we will not be defeated.   
The only thing standing between America and  continued preeminence is Barack Obama.  The sooner we realize that, and  rid the nation of the abomination of his presidency, the better.  http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/m-americas_greatness_will_defeat_obama.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
 
 
Great stuff to know about. Thanks for all the research and verification you do for us. Nice photographs, too !
ReplyDelete