Due to the fact that this Administration seems to be attempting to overwhelm us with all they are doing, I have decided to shorten each blog.  I will be blogging Monday through Friday to make it easier for you to get the late breaking news.
The UK News reports: The Obama administration faced an embarrassing diplomatic blunder  today after it was forced to pull a warning about racism in Spain - just  as the First Lady arrived in the country for a summer holiday.
Staff  at the U.S. State Department removed the contentious advice to  travellers, which included the phrase 'racist prejudices could lead to  the arrest of Afro-Americans who travel to Spain,' from its website on  Monday.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Washington Examiner opines: Do you think Shirley Sherrod has a good case in suing Andrew Breitbart for showing only some of her speech?  From the Washington Examiner comes this testimony from one who used to work for her: What most of Mrs. Sherrod’s supporters are not aware of is the elitist  and anti-black-labor role that she and fellow managers of New  Communities Inc. (NCI) played. These individuals under-paid, mistreated  and fired black laborers–many of them less than 16 years of age–in the  same fields of southwest Georgia where their ancestors suffered under  chattel slavery. 
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/Examiner-Opinion-Zone/Former-Shirley-Sherrod-nci-employee-accuses-her-of-exploiting-black-farm-laborers-99880014.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, an Army physician, has refused  to obey any orders  from his commanding officers -- including President Obama -- until Obama  produces his birth certificate. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/01/terry-lakin-army-birther_n_521549.html
LTC Lakin Arraignment Hearing on August 6, 2010
Western Center for  Journalism 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Regarding  Medicare/Medicaid's wonderful money saving properties, announced by  this Administration, unfortunately for secretary Sebelius, however, as  reported by Newsmax: the Congressional Budget  Office has on numerous occasions confirmed that any claims the law will  improve Medicare’s solvency revolve around notional double-counting  under federal budgetary conventions.
Obama Administration  Caught Cooking the Books on Obamacare
A January CBO letter found that “the majority of the [Medicare] trust   fund savings . . . would be used to pay for other spending and therefore  would not enhance the ability of the government to pay for future  Medicare benefits.” And in a March letter, CBO quantified the amount of  that double-counting, estimating that, if the law’s Medicare savings  were actually set aside to improve the solvency of the Medicare trust  fund (as opposed to being used for other spending), the bill would  increase the deficit by $260 billion over its first ten years alone.
In other words, the CBO agrees with the CMS actuary that the same money  can’t be used twice — once to expand coverage, and a second time to  extend the life of the Medicare trust fund.  The secretary’s statement  that “there are two different operating methods of looking at this,” and  that CBO disagrees with the administration’s own actuaries on the  impact of this budgetary double-counting, is demonstrably false.
  
http://www.newsmax.com/GroverNorquist/Norquist--Sebelius--Medicare--Medicaid--Obamacare/2010/08/03/id/366484
           
                                   r request is being processed...         
                                                                                            
 
 
I REALLY LIKE THE IDEA OF SHORTER AND MORE FREQUENT REPORTS-THANKS! And, proud of the military guy for challenging the Obama birth record...AS for the Medicare financial numbers, what else should we expect from one of the most corrupt politicians in modern times ?!
ReplyDelete